Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EAC2DB12 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16927 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 14:32:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16896 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 14:32:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16886 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2012 14:32:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:32:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.67.31.101] (HELO smtprelay06.ispgateway.de) (80.67.31.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:32:39 +0000 Received: from [10.128.0.3] (helo=exchange.df.eu) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1TBnzF-0001ZV-5l for flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:32:17 +0200 Received: from ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local ([10.128.2.55]) by efe03.exchange.local ([10.128.0.3]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:32:17 +0200 From: "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:32:14 +0200 Subject: AW: Javadoc for Falcon Thread-Topic: Javadoc for Falcon Thread-Index: Ac2Q8ervILClykXORsir5Yc+pO5myQAASY6w Message-ID: <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072DDC94EFB@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local> References: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B3A89C117@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> <504FF035.9070208@dot-com-it.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Nevertheless it's still good to have good old Google index the Asdoc conten= t ... I think I'm not the only developer that thinks it's quicker to use a = search engine in order to find Api documentation than to open it from disk = ;-) -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Raju Bitter [mailto:r.bitter.mailinglists@googlemail.com]=20 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2012 16:21 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; jeffry@dot-com-it.com Betreff: Re: Javadoc for Falcon >> I'd check a zipped version of the docs into Subversion. > I'm pretty sure that it is an "Apache Way" no no to put binary files=20 > into the repository if it can be avoided. In this case, I don't=20 > believe zipping up generated docs is an unavoidable approach. I think the decision should be based on the fact if there's a binary distri= bution available. A binary distribution should be packaged with the generat= ed docs, but if there is no binary distribution, people have to get the sou= rce code anyway. - Raju