Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C36E3D08F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85240 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 19:33:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85209 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 19:33:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85200 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2012 19:33:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:33:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.29] (HELO exprod6og112.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:33:10 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob112.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUC1K4W24s5wD/UTQux3lFO+EIZBy4I4q@postini.com; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:32:50 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q7GJUKk0013439 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q7GJWmvm024661 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:32:48 -0700 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:32:47 -0700 Subject: Re: Release Managers and Multi-platform releases (was Re: [MENTOR] How to handle Air app signing certificate) Thread-Topic: Release Managers and Multi-platform releases (was Re: [MENTOR] How to handle Air app signing certificate) Thread-Index: Ac1702CYQKDjS6OVQ46TDJUhOun5owAEomTJ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 8/16/12 10:19 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 8/16/12 12 :38PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 8/16/12 6:11 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>>=20 >>> This is not the topic of this thread but I think the release manager ha= s >>> to be able to produce both packages. >>>=20 >>> Carol >>>=20 >> Interesting issue. Theoretically we only release source so I don't see h= ow >> you would need something platform specific. The binary convenience >> packages >> are not official so if you only have one computer, it should be "ok" to >> have >> someone supply the other platform's bin-kit. >=20 > It matters for the installer since 99% of the people who want it are afte= r > the binaries and aren't interested in the building source (which now will > include getting a certificate.p12 file). >=20 > Carol >=20 I understand the installer needs a Mac binary and a Win binary, but since they are not official releases, I don't see why the release manager can't ask someone else to build a package for them. --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui