Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.37 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:09:36 -0700
Subject: Re: SVN and issues with branching / consider how we use SVN going
 forward
Thread-Topic: SVN and issues with branching / consider how we use SVN going
 forward
Thread-Index: Ac10de6Oj1Jl42QfRjWzRGhytDfk0QAOLm4J
Message-ID: <CC467DC0.440B1%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEWfVJn3Mhr0Q2XArnUorhzx_xO1raUC_31wag59eMybccbUMA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


On 8/7/12 1:23 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> ...IIRC, merging worked pretty well for us.  I am currently not afraid o=
f it,
>> especially since we are using SVN 1.6....
>=20
> From the community standpoint, I think working in the same trunk as
> much as possible is much better, in general.
So you are not a fan of the whiteboard->unstable->trunk approach?  Or just
not having a ton of personal branches. I thought some Apache projects used
the tiered approach.

--=20
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui