Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8A7CD880 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56747 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2012 10:00:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56338 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2012 10:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 56304 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2012 10:00:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:00:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of carlos.rovira@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:00:08 +0000 Received: by yenm1 with SMTP id m1so4159916yen.6 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:59:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JvWWMKcXJLFxFBETwJ9hPTqqlFV5XiCHzyFHkta17nc=; b=0Bi0hDPNheXXFeL3RoEv9Mjfz6yjYumu9ehhEcHGZsPMSBJY6hSuhTadV7dLWavKzz opKIXA26lquW0WEPDTAs00RjGn88+ECSQVJ/VNKoDUJDgT4oRDGcIltCzLJ2nbcC4Fhq 8LK6cX7waMGbIxyGpEumfJFh4mLjR2sZevWNLOObz2yGRbc0Mpl7bjvwQDpR+nU1XRvq RQSL/HgQ06CQopf/Mn2ijsjAJRfW3p8bOdaGn4HCmiSHcuofWoAgsVSLgeYH+D3f4jFm slhrfaPDCsZ80myuBqPu9jD+kGzRe8qsx8JHKgSJufbW+AW7YM0/BZpXSELJ6xfX/mmi 8LYQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.181.225 with SMTP id l61mr6829007yhm.47.1345197587447; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: carlos.rovira@gmail.com Received: by 10.101.108.14 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 02:59:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <878B4975-324D-45E9-86AB-B5600D5C4D50@classsoftware.com> <8945277267058896357@unknownmsgid> <1823C8C5-83DC-4ADB-841C-49F5529A79EA@classsoftware.com> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:59:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XBGs9s7ob9VzHlx2ZVPRsOPzzvw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache Flex in Github From: Carlos Rovira To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305639ab5a40d304c773384f --20cf305639ab5a40d304c773384f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Erik, I understand what you say and I'm trying to give you and others as many information as possible and to respond to questions about GIT to help get most of us up and running with GBM and GIT, and proposing ways to overcome the difficulties in Apache INFRA while we get full git support. I must to say that I'm not an expert on GIT since I was a SVN user and switch to GIT three or four months ago. At work we changed to GIT due to the seam needs we face today in Apache Flex project: We need to change deep changes in the core of a huge product in our company. Something that could not be done with our classic SVN development model. We switched to GBM and GIT with success. So, please, feel free to ask and I'll do my best to respond to your question in order to solve the problems you face. I'll recomend you to enter github, make an account, make a fork from Apache Flex mirror repository and try to make some patch and propose a pull request of your change to PPMC. Let me know if you have some problems. Best, Carlos 2012/8/17 Erik de Bruin > Carlos, > > I did read the thread before posting, but clearly I didn't understand > all that was said. I got through the first posts stating 'read-only -> > do patches in Jira', but got confused later on, apparently. > > The people used to the Git model should show a little patience towards > us 'old-school' SVN folks, please. Git takes some getting used to when > you come from SVN, as some of the terminology used is the same, some > is new, and, confusingly, SOME IS THE SAME, BUT MEANS SOMETHING > DIFFERENT. I'm sure we're all trying to get our heads around the new > way of working and the new tooling involved. > > Also, as long as there is no full support for Git, do we try to > 'force' Git, or do we continue in SVN. Doing both at the same time > seems confusing and means a lot of extra work for the committers, as > they have to operate both systems... > > EdB > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Carlos Rovira > wrote: > > Hi Erik, > > > > yes, please read the response from Jose Barrag=E1n in this thread (the > third > > one) > > > > "The PPMC team members can checkout an entire remote branch of > comunity > > members from github, and having reviewed and accepted all work, > push > > the > > new branch against the official apache repository." > > > > We was talking about use the apache flex mirror in github [1]. Since PP= MC > > controls apache flex mirror in github the can approve/disapprove all pu= ll > > request from contributors. > > > > Contributors has full commodity of development and they only need to wo= rk > > for patches and propose via pull request. If the work is valid, PPMC ca= n > > commit the patch to the official repository > > > > This allows as to implement GBM asap while other people are voluntering > to > > bring official git support to apache and apache flex. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flex > > > > > > > > 2012/8/17 Erik de Bruin > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> According to "http://git.apache.org/" the Apache Git mirrors are > >> 'read-only'. To me that means that you can clone them at will, but > >> that in order to get the changes you made to your branch into the code > >> base, you need to create a patch from Git and apply that to the SVN > >> repository... Am I missing something? > >> > >> EdB > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Carlos Rovira > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Justin, > >> > > >> > since I made a pull request from github I thought attach a patch was > not > >> > needed. > >> > > >> > I just made one and attached to the ticket. > >> > > >> > This will be need always with new model? these seems totaly unnecesa= ry > >> with > >> > the mechanishm of pull request...you have all the tools to evaluate, > >> isn't > >> > it? I think the main point here is see the most efficient way to get > >> > contributions and for this to happen, the process should have few > steps. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > Carlos Rovira > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/8/17 Justin Mclean > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> > I open a JIRA ticket and made the pull request from my forked > >> repository > >> >> in > >> >> > github to apache flex github repository. > >> >> > >> >> Perhaps I'm missing something but there no patch in JIRA that I can > see. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Justin > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Carlos Rovira > >> > Director de Tecnolog=EDa > >> > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > >> > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > >> > > >> > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. > >> > Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32 > >> > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q > >> > 28020 Madrid > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Ix Multimedia Software > >> > >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >> 3521 VB Utrecht > >> > >> T. 06-51952295 > >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > Director de Tecnolog=EDa > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > F: +34 912 35 57 77 > > > > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. > > Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32 > > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q > > 28020 Madrid > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > --=20 Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnolog=EDa M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid --20cf305639ab5a40d304c773384f--