Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of carlos.rovira@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: carlos.rovira@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACK5iZfCK3d5wA5QiS6TNcaGN9jiXOG1z6-gyTXpBg9iiqsdBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CC51F690.44ABF%aharui@adobe.com>
	<3FF66025-0C04-44DA-B4C8-B94516F5F197@classsoftware.com>
	<CACK5iZfCK3d5wA5QiS6TNcaGN9jiXOG1z6-gyTXpBg9iiqsdBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:38:30 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAMFKFRhcDh_XacKDn-Pskypk=mYeDnv1Yf13EAoZO2dUM7ygrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting To Git (was Re: [MENTORS] Current Branching Strategy Vote
 Results)
From: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b13eacc0b1904c75df7b6

--20cf305b13eacc0b1904c75df7b6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm with you Om. Now that we all have clear that we want 9# as a result of
the voting, it's a matter of getting the pieces enter in the puzzle. The
main thing here IMHO is that we choose for a model of future and we, as a
team, should row towards that goal.


2012/8/16 Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com>

> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I raised several concerns but lets not go over that ground again.
> >
> > We'll need to have some documentation on how it's going to work and wha=
t
> > SVN commands we need to use in each case. Anyone want to help out with
> this?
> >
> > We have a few people who don't know both SNV and Git well and no one us=
ed
> > Gitflow before (that I know) so even some simple guidance/instructions =
is
> > going to help everyone.
> >
> > >> How do we share the local branches that would exist in git?
> > > That may be one thing we can't do, but I don't think that was in the
> > > diagram, but I'm also not familiar enough with Git to say for sure.
> >
> > Most of the branches shown in the digram are local and only master and
> > develop are central in my understanding.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
>
>
> It is going to be a bit before we can answer all these questions.  From t=
he
> git branching model, we need master (trunk) and the develop branch right
> away.  I believe everything else can wait and we can do it when needed.
> Any reason we need to branch right away?  I am not aware of any major
> 'feature' branches or a release imminently coming up.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>


--=20
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnolog=EDa
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 35 57 77
<http://www.codeoscopic.com>
CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32
Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
28020 Madrid

--20cf305b13eacc0b1904c75df7b6--