Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA46AD0F0 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45153 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2012 22:24:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45119 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2012 22:24:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45111 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2012 22:24:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:24:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of carlos.rovira@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gg0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:24:44 +0000 Received: by ggmq1 with SMTP id q1so3648461ggm.6 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LA4GLOG6yd1ilUMHiy9niLCMCG+Gs7q85xX1CgbJRgY=; b=FB0oEVEySzEKKAwXxwjIGcHzSzcq0ipQsEMC2lVPDrcNYbiIBf+y0uWcyyLe7j7XjQ eg8km5BJ2AHgNGmAZtoI+e+fL4M44PqLR7A5uLY3N8Z5wXmr5PXIdBAruSQ9d3TRzGCd OnhR/PmgmWpFJUeITENKQwc9u/h7a8y+g2+qKBkg9v1ei3Fs1kT1OFZ6OVupr+5j7KL8 9t4tEClOUz55m30/xcIYblhmVt7V+RelbLnd0zEfXUxL70Xr/VrIKuZxEaXAlgiRYqZC 0aesrUc8jYxb/1HeYEGWVVm/s88jgQq/fyXt2Ybj2BaPfyhH8f9QL4B9P7JUiDW3ZpJL NRIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.200.167 with SMTP id z27mr9714929yhn.131.1344896663925; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: carlos.rovira@gmail.com Received: by 10.101.108.14 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:24:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3F9B848F-C9E7-458C-8A7A-11A07EF92CAD@comcast.net> References: <3F9B848F-C9E7-458C-8A7A-11A07EF92CAD@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:24:23 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SuwB4bLAeV2L2g4Rmae1ifcq_JE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Branching Strategy and SCM From: Carlos Rovira To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305641f3e9b21a04c72d275f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf305641f3e9b21a04c72d275f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2012/8/14 Dave Fisher > One thing I like about SVN is that it discourages branching to necessary > times while git encourages branching for a whim. > SVN discourages branching because is not a core part in the design of the system, while in Git is a core part. In SVN you try to not branch because you know the nightmare it could bring to your source code. In Git you will want to branch because it brings clarity and best practice to you development model... --=20 Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnolog=EDa M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid --20cf305641f3e9b21a04c72d275f--