Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072DB7A210D@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local>
References: 
 <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072DB7A210D@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:40:11 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vtq-MbthZ7YHW3x+UsJcXju0pp0ySje-sGX40hGESV9Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Current status on Flexunit4?
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ca01cd9ca3104c82ddc10

--20cf307ca01cd9ca3104c82ddc10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, August 26, 2012, christofer.dutz@c-ware.de wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This topic might be a liitle off-topic, but as I have read quite a few
> statements on Adobe and Flexunit here, I thougt it would be the best plac=
e
> to ask. As it seems that the Flexunit.org mailinglist isn't really active
> anymore.
>
> I just finished some work on Flexmojos unittesting support, especially
> supporting parametrized tests in conjunction with Flexunit4. Currently I
> don't want to push my changes back to FMs trunk, because I am not quite
> sure what the current status on Flexunit is.
>
> Currently Flexmojos supports two flex unit testing frameworks called
> "flexunit"
> - com.adobe.flexunit:flexunit:0.85:swc  (called flexunit in FM)
> - com.adobe.flexunit:flexunit: 4.0-beta-2:swc (called flexunit4 in FM)
> I am quite unsure about the later one of them. On the Project page
> http://www.flexunit.org/ I can see no reference to adobe at all. Even the
> package structure is different and all refer to "org.flexunit". So I'm
> guessing this is a second project unluckily also called "Flexunit". Am I
> correct about this? In this case the current groupId used in FM shouldn't
> be "com.apache.flexunit" but something different . but what should it be
> instead?
> My second area of uncertainty regarding flexunit (from flexunit.org) is
> what the latest version is. The Blog on the page claims to be 4.1 RC2, bu=
t
> the download page states 4.1 ("stable" without the RC2).
> Assuming the flexunit.org project is different from adobes project and
> that RC2 has become the final release I was thinking about using
> org.flexunit:flexunit:4.1.0:swc as version and would like to have this
> published in a public repo.
>
> It would be great if you could help me sort this out.
>
> Chris
>
>
> [ C h r i s t o f e r  D u t z ]
>
> C-Ware IT-Service
> Inhaber
> Dipl. Inf. Christofer Dutz
> Karlstra=DFe. 104, 64285 Darmstadt
>
> fon:  0 61 51 / 27315 - 61
> fax:  0 61 51 / 27315 - 64
> mobil:  0171 / 7 444 2 33
> email:  christofer.dutz@c-ware.de <javascript:;>
>
> http://www.c-ware.de
>
> UStId-Nr. DE195700962
>
>
>
Michael Labriola and Digital Primates are currently in the process of
making the software grant to the ASF and FlexUnit will soon be in Apache
repositories. I would sit tight. ;)

-omar

--20cf307ca01cd9ca3104c82ddc10--