Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <391032D7-4A8C-40B6-875A-E921DD627125@comcast.net>
References: <CC4EAF57.446B9%aharui@adobe.com>
	<391032D7-4A8C-40B6-875A-E921DD627125@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:43:46 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vtSiKFfw0TaUVQWvB7+ksU6LbGCVvwiaEjPPS_g-x2KCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Branching Strategy and SCM
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cdcab91249c404c72bc0e4

--14dae9cdcab91249c404c72bc0e4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

> My opinion/vote is (4) - no guts, no glory - work in trunk and learn to
> co-operate.
>
> The vote is more about the Classic model than it is about Git  vs. SVN.
>
> To me svn tag == git branch.
>
> Regards,
> Dave


People that use Git a lot would strongly disagree with "svn tag == git
branch". For starters, SVN tags are supposed to not ever be edited, and Git
branches are used for almost all new code addition/changes in the "nvie"
model, so they're from from ==.

-omar

--14dae9cdcab91249c404c72bc0e4--