Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B22F99CE4 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5102 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 00:08:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5067 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 00:08:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5057 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2012 00:08:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:08:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:07:54 +0000 Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so3980513vbb.6 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:07:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EgPfMRM9dXyfggIXofBXa6wgKZotKOdHSU/bIYVBOIM=; b=Y3wRR6ZXghhQklm/2nxZGKraCGIQEQ3Dl7gx7ca6Ih8rMOTu2XxoP+4CW+dD9cdAU+ hYFHFHZodWFXzyCg1jO3gTptHjliOMMg3ExCkG8cqsXVe+tBDJmPOrVi9MA/PfBtQjf+ Q21Hz1V67iuSRTJErgKSuZh7p9KYW3FXHiV7kVQv6QtmvjjyqrWnC+t5a9mL+i5elFLO Y+Mw8yrZSyiCKdd6OJJRyPn+rBmXjPSsRjUT4ZE5uWR+rmpFx1wx4kSZuhQJ7G9KvcGK 3DgdCo2pSiFTHusoPSsPW9PSA64TfMr/s9R+xNRdp5Wn4aAZuCJIpTJzFAKPsoOXwRYy ZAEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.21.82 with SMTP id t18mr8179606vde.66.1344902853644; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.249.139 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:07:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3F9B848F-C9E7-458C-8A7A-11A07EF92CAD@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:07:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Branching Strategy and SCM From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d00b4d9509c04c72e9823 --20cf307d00b4d9509c04c72e9823 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > In the 3-Tier scheme how many buildbots and test rigs are required vs. > the > > work in trunk method? > One CI server for trunk and one for "develop". In either scheme if you cut > a branch I guess you have to add buildbots for them as well? > > > > Don't know why we would need more than one CI server, Jenkins can have multiple jobs running at the same time, one server with multiple jobs should be enough no? -omar --20cf307d00b4d9509c04c72e9823--