Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of justinmclean@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
Sender: Justin Mclean <justinmclean@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1280)
Subject: Re: New namespaces and Flash Builder issues
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMFKFRhUugdpeswRuyXUBMeR4ECnABomxd9OEF=JSnzwagQ11g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:23:42 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5CF46130-F7AF-4674-B0A8-D232266AB530@classsoftware.com>
References: <238B2A8F-8498-440F-B33A-382AE5472CC1@classsoftware.com>
 <CAMFKFRhUugdpeswRuyXUBMeR4ECnABomxd9OEF=JSnzwagQ11g@mail.gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org

Hi,

> This is newly a vendor tooling issue to be worked with people at =
adobe. But
> again, I think that tool should be framework compliant and not the
> inverse...
In a perfect world sure I would agree. However there a lot of people =
still using Flash Builder 4.6 and to encourage them to move to Apache =
Flex SDK we need to make things easy for them. Hopefully Flash Builder =
4.7 (or whatever the next version is) won't have issues like this.

> (as this was discussed in packaing sdk for flash builder...)
The packager issue was more of a licensing one, parts of Flex 4.6 were =
not compatible with Apache licensing the installer was created to make =
it a little easier for users of the SDK.

Thanks,
Justin=20=