From flex-dev-return-11038-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Aug 14 14:18:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DB57D6F7 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99431 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 14:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99301 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2012 14:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99292 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2012 14:18:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:18:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:18:36 +0000 Received: by eekb57 with SMTP id b57so142408eek.6 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:18:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pdRKSG2GEuZhA8xCJcvcUHe7cEuxEPZO7rJlJG8sG7Q=; b=C19IsEuTITMsd4wv1E3AXd5WbOWrMFnYsRIWTTZoJOQgWOhaOwxqU0w7l68e04F/VA zjf9HywllVlg4YrnqZAQm81JTCRstZjvseRrruuHkajZ8XYq7F4ozCHC8uJUAtI5eM4h 9aeZj0KgYiuzZt2SdtfeaY8VTkRPx3SnM67veRGAX0dcOXlHPiU04zMK9JoQxYavxhZZ a68kP/v+WG79mpCtGtazYLgVx9JaqRYAPQqTej7coqq8E6fQei3o+bh2Ym7aLYsUuOWq +o8IT3gjuqBba47K/u3Bb3iYoFNpSpsVfb8GR2TGe8KDJSMX2+XKi4uSp5gSrcqp39ps QMEw== Received: by 10.14.211.3 with SMTP id v3mr15386835eeo.43.1344953896855; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:18:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.198.68 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:17:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5025AC44.1070808@dot-com-it.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Fernandes?= Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:17:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What would it take to move to Git? To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b621e9242e85304c73a7b00 --047d7b621e9242e85304c73a7b00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Carlos, I just can speak for myself and my vote counts nothing (non-binding) but I'm willing to learn anything that is required but my question is, besides the branching model to adopt, how much work is required to have everything working under GIT? Can it be a working process while code can keep being improved and fixed? Can we use both side by side till everything is ready for GIT only? I'm not assuming we'll moving to GIT right away but as Bertrand mentioned, we need to work as a team and if PPMC members aren't able to find a strategy for Apache Flex when it comes to source control, how is it going to work for code additions/changes? Jo=E3o Fernandes --047d7b621e9242e85304c73a7b00--