incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dwayne Henderson <its.code.in.h...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What would it take to move to Git?
Date Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:48:18 GMT
+1 for Git

Interesting Git thread over at the OpenBSD mailinglist as well:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/198461

--Dwayne

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:

> If you want to support GIt, please vote in the sbiling thread! vote is open
> now! :)
>
> 2012/8/14 jude <flexcapacitor@gmail.com>
>
> > I'm comfortable with SVN too but support the move to Git / GitHub because
> > it is an environment that makes work like this much more efficient.
> People
> > can easily fork the project, make a change and get it to a working state.
> > Then the main branch can easily patch those changes back in. It is also
> an
> > active community. There are many people that can join in, see changes and
> > discussions.
> >
> > However, I don't know how much of GitHub's workflow we can integrate into
> > an ASF project.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Igor, until now (flex < 4.8) I don' t see deep changes in flex core
> like
> > > the ones people want to perform. Spark and other features were always
> > > "additive".
> > >
> > > SVN works well with such projects. But we target now other kind of
> > changes
> > > in the core that never was done before in flex.
> > >
> > > So I would like to know how would you plan to modify a core piece like
> > > UIComponent with near 15k code lines while other people make other
> > changes
> > > without a tool like GIT...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lunes, 13 de agosto de 2012, Igor Costa escribió:
> > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > > "But the real problem for me is that we can't target the changes we
> > plan
> > > > without a tool like Git. Maybe people that does not know Git does not
> > > > understand this, but we were not able to make such deep changes if we
> > are
> > > > using SVN."
> > > >
> > > > Flex SDK was built over 4 versions using SVN, Since Flex 3 we
> > > open-sourced
> > > > SDK.
> > > >
> > > > The only questionable thing for this entire thread is we must focus
> on
> > > Flex
> > > > project not in Infra.
> > > >
> > > > SVN or Git whatever, we have to keep focus on Flex evolves, otherwise
> > > > community members will lose their interesting on the Apache Flex
> > project.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To make a final statement we have to open vote and finish up and move
> > to
> > > > the next episode. Mustella, Falcon, things that are important right
> now
> > > for
> > > > SDK.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If SVN worked so well by until know, why make changes on winning
> team?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > ----------------------------
> > > > Igor Costa
> > > > www.igorcosta.com
> > > > www.igorcosta.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > > carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > IMHO, and taking into account that I'm only a not-binding vote...
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see real arguments against Git and maybe as Omar says
> people
> > > does
> > > > > not want to figth with yet another SCM...
> > > > >
> > > > > But the real problem for me is that we can't target the changes we
> > plan
> > > > > without a tool like Git. Maybe people that does not know Git does
> not
> > > > > understand this, but we were not able to make such deep changes if
> we
> > > are
> > > > > using SVN.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's the real problem, and that's what we end planing the use of
> > > > > Git...this is not a techy discussion. We at work had to change two
> > > months
> > > > > ago due to hard refactors in our main product, and we changed
> because
> > > SVN
> > > > > was not letting us do such deep changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > So my vote will go for Git without doubt...if we don't use it, we
> > > should
> > > > > not be able to change things like UIComponent...hope people that
> does
> > > not
> > > > > want Git understand this.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2012/8/13 Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Carol Frampton <
> > cframpto@adobe.com
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > A clarification question about Git:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Would I lose the ability to look at the repro thru the
web. I
> > make
> > > > use
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/trunk/
etc
> more
> > > > often
> > > > > > then
> > > > > > > I expected.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carol
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > You can browse it through Git HTTP:
> > > > http://git.apache.org/flex-site.git/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Or you can view it through GitHub:
> https://github.com/apache/flex
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -omar
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > Director de Tecnología
> > > > > M: +34 607 22 60 05
> > > > > F:  +34 912 35 57 77
> > > > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> > > > > CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> > > > > Avd. del General Perón, 32
> > > > > Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
> > > > > 28020 Madrid
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from Gmail Mobile
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Director de Tecnología
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> F:  +34 912 35 57 77
> <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> Avd. del General Perón, 32
> Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
> 28020 Madrid
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message