incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Falcon location
Date Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:16:56 GMT
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, Gordon Smith wrote:

> Hi, Justin.
>
> To me that sounds like a kludge with little benefit and presumably worse
> performance than either compiler by itself. I take it that you are unhappy
> with the decision to compile MXML directly to ABC, for maximum performance,
> if it means losing -keep? If so, you could work on a alternate compilation
> path for MXML in Falcon that involved either real or fake (i.e., not
> actually compiled) AS. What is the main problem that you use -keep to
> solve? Perhaps Falcon's option that displays MXML syntax trees could be
> another solution for you.
>
> - Gordon
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 6:26 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Falcon right now is an ActionScript compiler with limited MXML support,
> so
> >> right now you can't simply change the old compiler by the new one.
> >
> > Probably some reason to why we cant do this but couldn't we use the
> current compiler to turn MXML into AS (-keep of top of head) and then use
> Falcon to compile that AS?
> >
> > Justin
>

I think Justin's looking for a stop gap solution for compiling MXML with
Falcon. At least that's what I read from it.

-omar

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message