Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A27FDEF4 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45917 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 04:55:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45790 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 04:55:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45739 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2012 04:55:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:55:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.189] (HELO exprod6og105.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:55:33 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUBdlLwn+w6cgHhg2OxDALs17zBHWcZzD@postini.com; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:55:13 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q6V4qik0010438 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q6V4t9Yr029908 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:55:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.264.0; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:55:09 -0700 Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%12]) with mapi; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:55:08 -0700 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:55:07 -0700 Subject: Re: What namespace should new components go in? Thread-Topic: What namespace should new components go in? Thread-Index: Ac1uwTbqXykVI4QyQ5S2UzgsHAF2RQAF3DX1 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 7/30/12 7:06 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Reposting (and expanding) as suggested under a new topic to make it clear= this > discussion is about namespaces. This has been discussed on the list befor= e but > no clear consensus was reached. >=20 Can there be a #6? If there was an MX version and you are essentially creating the Spark version then put it under the spark namespace. Otherwise, put it in a new namespace. There should be multiple new namespaces where it makes sense. Start with the one you've suggested for now and we'll see what gets contributed and organize accordingly. --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui