Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMFKFRjQNodCYJow5UYf=-ZOyv50RXGxzMV+m762pYioqR0_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CC20E714.17995%cframpto@adobe.com>
	<CAMFKFRjQNodCYJow5UYf=-ZOyv50RXGxzMV+m762pYioqR0_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:39:51 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALorpXeBf2WToe2VEv+zAQXKNa6-AbvbwY06JFWqRsHbW2zKrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex 4.8.0 - RC3 - build number 1359417
 (and Flex has been trademark signed off by Adobe for donation to Apache)
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747bd8240ca8304c47830ab

--00151747bd8240ca8304c47830ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Carlos,

There are some descriptor files that need to be created for Flash Builder
to "see" the SDK, yet are not created during the compile process.
(flex-sdk-description.xml I believe?).

You need to either create these by hand, or use the
makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder tool that has been talked about in these
threads to create the file for you.

-Nick

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com> wrote:

> Hi Carol,
>
> yesterday I test RC2 and I get a "build successful" from ant in
> construction. Then I tried to add in Flash Builder flex sdks dialog. But =
Fb
> reported me that the sdk was not a flex sdk. Is something normal? have yo=
u
> or someone test the SDK with  some tool? maybe some of the fixes in RC3
> will make this work?
>
> thanks in advance for your help
>
> Best,
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
> 2012/7/10 Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a parity release with Adobe Flex 4.6.0.
> >
> > The Adobe donation of the Flex trademark was signed off by Adobe on Jul=
y
> > 4th - Independence Day!  Now is the time to download this kit, test it
> out
> > and vote on it's release.  I'd like to get a minimum of 10 positive vot=
es
> > but more would be great.
> >
> > The official Apache distribution is the source kit which can contain on=
ly
> > source.
> > Because of this requirement, and various licensing constraints, there a=
re
> > a few differences.
> >
> > Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
> >
> > Distributions:
> > http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/release_candidate_3/<
> > http://people.apache.org/~cframpton/ApacheFlexRC/release_candidate_2/>
> >
> > Fixes from Release Candidate 2 (build 1358354):
> > fix copylocale for both the bin and source packages
> > makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder now assumes it is in the Flex SDK and
> > doesn't download it (source kit must be built first)
> >
> > Before voting please review the section,
> > "What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?", at
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Carol
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Director de Tecnolog=EDa
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
> F:  +34 912 35 57 77
> <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
> Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32
> Planta 10, Puertas P-Q
> 28020 Madrid
>

--00151747bd8240ca8304c47830ab--