Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CAA49556 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42405 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2012 16:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42365 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2012 16:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42354 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2012 16:37:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:37:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of r.bitter.mailinglists@googlemail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:37:38 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l5so3736793lbo.6 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dIainvKjTwM8VfrCSRXtgYy4lkWUEs4L1fx4UMBugb4=; b=AUBZ3IxHeTw+4OMaHzYXtE7hdCGv9jH76xxEuXIfp96QDde5XQB1Qd2U1JWEh2nVlg EUU+NS3nVd9iPcOm5ikdcIhBu8YGSn1Xouhw1aCCvhb+HVAIdQrAo12JpVa5M4lKOO07 2BIKTKd/Iz9EJOo33zRqmQjMg5+ZrwOcALZrXSgr3ciQNJKuqHlyoYhTa2X8BV43iM9A lOWBtAvb0da2J7o5m0PRrqtYKAbw+1TEYkWCOJQ9zE6g96QSLIWaBva3MHzj+BQ4vam/ FLKxeyDwb9nG/pFzVc3GXKogvczeR9ET6FS+of0COFbeGgFEXKozramC3Y0xU5y+/mEf gGDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.102.234 with SMTP id fr10mr2944988lab.32.1342715837426; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.116.197 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:37:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Is it possible to use Apache Flex 4.8 when targeting Flash Player 11.4? From: Raju Bitter To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I just read the release notes for Flash Player 11.4, which can be found here: http://labsdownload.adobe.com/pub/labs/flashplatformruntimes/shared/air3-4_flashplayer11-4_p1_releasenotes.pdf In the section "Authoring for Flash Player 11.4" it's mentioned that we should use the 4.5.1 Flex SDK, and not Flex 4.6. "Download Flex 4.5.1 SDK (4.5.1.21328) from the Flex 4.5 SDK table." Does that mean that Apache Flex 4.8 cannot be used to author content for FP 11.4? Is there a technical reason why the 4.5.1 SDK should be used when you are targeting FP 11.4? - Raju