incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>
Subject Re: next release 4.9 or 4.8.1?
Date Tue, 24 Jul 2012 02:59:28 GMT
I like this better.  I hate having the idea of an 'unstable' version
number.  If it is unstable, it shouldn't be in the trunk ;)

-Nick

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> On Jul 23, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Rick Winscot wrote:
>
> > Some do... some don't.
> >
> > http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxPMGT/version-numbering-scheme.html
> >
> > I was just thinking that it would be nice to have some kind of pattern
> (for a while) to identify stable releases.
>
> Unstable versions could follow a pattern like.
>
> 5.0Alpha1, 5.0Beta1, 5.0Beta2
>
> With stable being 5.0
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> > R
> >
> >
> > On Monday, July 23, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Rick Winscot <rick.winscot@gmail.com(mailto:
> rick.winscot@gmail.com)>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anyone thinking about adopting an even / odd numbering system to denote
> >>> stable / development releases?
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Is that status quo for other apache projects?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jonathan Campos
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message