incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex 4.8.0 - RC3 - build number 1359417 (and Flex has been trademark signed off by Adobe for donation to Apache)
Date Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:02:08 GMT

On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 7/13/12 12:07 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Quoting Bertrand - "If there's a reasonable way to
>> validate that particular fla, and it's only optional and not required
>> to use Apache Flex anyway, it can probably stay in the release IMO,
>> but Incubator PMC members might think differently."
>> 
> It is optional, only those wishing to create components for Flex via Flash
> Pro need to use it.

OK. Should this be part of Om's InstallApacheFlex utility. If it becomes a problem for someone
on the IPMC then we can download it on demand like other components.

> 
>> Is there a reasonable way to for a user to validate this FLA?
> Maybe I don't understand what it means to validate.  If you open the FLA in
> Flash Pro you can see what is in it.  How does one validate the .DOC files
> in AOO?

For AOO and POI the included .DOC files are clearly test documents that are used by the test
suites to confirm functionality. Users will need to trust that these are all suitable for
that use. It is possible for POI (not sure about AOO) that some of these files may be examples
of those that are badly formed and their purpose is to check security.

The purpose of the FLA is to show a user how to work in Flash Pro? If so, that's a bit different.
Let's see if it really becomes an issue.

Regards,
Dave


> 
> -- 
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> 


Mime
View raw message