Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:24:18 +0200
Subject: AW: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs?
Thread-Topic: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs?
Thread-Index: Ac1TyEYSRFpjtGMyS+6en57HbOpvJQAbsRwgAA/b0gcAAl17MA==
Message-ID: 
 <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072D13B6DA3@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local>
References: 
 <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072D13B6C8F@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local>
 <CC106F99.423D1%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC106F99.423D1%aharui@adobe.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi,

well the work Adobe would need seems to be minimal. We would at least need =
them to deploy their playerglobal and airglobal swcs to maven central. I th=
ink Apache could volunteer to do that for them :-) I doubt uploading Binari=
es of the FlashPlayer and Air runntime for the multiple different operating=
 systems is something that has to be done. I'm currently absolutely fine wi=
th deploying them in my compaines local repo.

My SDK generator currently provides this Structure for the Adobe resources:

/com/adobe

/com/adobe/air
/com/adobe/air/airglobal
/com/adobe/air/airglobal/{air-version}
/com/adobe/air/airglobal/{air-version}/airglobal-{air-version}.swc
/com/adobe/air/airglobal/{air-version}/airglobal-{air-version}.pom
/com/adobe/air/runtime/{air-version}
/com/adobe/air/runtime/{air-version}/runtimte-{air-version}.pom
/com/adobe/air/runtime/{air-version}/runtimte-{air-version}-linux.uexe
/com/adobe/air/runtime/{air-version}/runtimte-{air-version}-mac.zip
 /com/adobe/air/runtime/{air-version}/runtimte-{air-version}-win.exe

/com/adobe/flash
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}/playerglobal-{flashplay=
er-version}.swc
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}/playerglobal-{flashplay=
er-version}.pom
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}/runtimte-{flashplayer-v=
ersion}.pom
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}/runtimte-{flashplayer-v=
ersion}-linux.uexe
/com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}/runtimte-{flashplayer-v=
ersion}-mac.zip
 /com/adobe/flash/playerglobal/{flashplayer-version}/runtimte-{flashplayer-=
version}-win.exe

But currently I'm deploying everything I can find in the SDKs
Every time a new Version of AIR or the Flashplayer is released it would be =
enough to publish only the playerglobal and airglobal.

Chris


-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]=20
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 17:07
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs?


On 6/27/12 12:37 AM, "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de=
>
wrote:

> The runntimes is where I think it starts getting problematic, as I=20
> think we would not be allowed to deploy the playerglobal versions and=20
> the flash/air runntimes in a Maven repo.
Without an agreement from Adobe, this is not allowed.  Someone can seek suc=
h an agreement, but are there other alternatives?  How much work is it for =
Adobe to place things in a Maven repo?  Is it possible for Adobe to host it=
s own Maven repo or otherwise make it easier for Maven to work with runtime=
 downloads?  If you can supply the recipe, I can see if Adobe can work with=
 it.

--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui