Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52F5891AF for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92247 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2012 10:30:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91857 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2012 10:30:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91829 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2012 10:30:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:30:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.177] (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:30:13 +0000 Received: by wibhm14 with SMTP id hm14so1073586wib.0 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 03:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=tDOe0pNnjnwzYk39rGgjYrXzt0VcPdlDt+y5vc15BN8=; b=NWP6yEIamgr/SBCF1Q9n9NKLRrDgLKW2hYWzC9vYdiWbpQ3mjVVUv/0T2hNGhQ5oAl Jc5OLZW/yRnLFzc8/DU0UsFhKOj2GDTbhuzPFjSN9mUJZlb4enB2ptAWWOwqb0MhzlGI Xlbmi7AGSoU5MV3C4ajLsNcIqY41OFGc09E9FzvoOKAwkgnTTdnnvqmXU0xbAUfkv+pL tBIWMB35pLufXFBJTLtvPir6X0REvsipm312VKrlurEfACsCS2SchFLOxlwfCXpvmK+6 SnIBLEILwE7ouBVA+rbRkU53PFGmdvTL4u7v2u1PLNTXuaj9IEHwBevFoyli9/Z/dMdM 4r4A== Received: by 10.216.143.73 with SMTP id k51mr4763947wej.55.1338632992732; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 03:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (a20100429161215.zb.lnet.pl. [195.74.50.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f19sm6000500wiw.11.2012.06.02.03.29.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Jun 2012 03:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FC9EB1D.3070000@fusecollective.com> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:29:49 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tYXN6IE1hY2nEhWcgfCBGdXNlIENvbGxlY3RpdmU=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache SDK to Flash Builder - anyone what to help out with design? References: <4FC5F8B5.9050409@fusecollective.com> <1B6CB11E-FDDE-4E53-A84D-E191C8C02B63@tink.ws> <4FC613AA.2050000@fusecollective.com> <280F39C2-E5ED-4A05-9555-7690D8B84B54@tink.ws> <29584BFC-F531-4276-95C8-AA52FEE92119@tink.ws> <4FC624D9.3020906@fusecollective.com> <2AD07DC7-4906-4867-841A-498F44ABDD87@tink.ws> <1B3CDC2B-9E27-4536-AD75-19ABD1D8DF8F@tink.ws> <4FC68CE7.1070202@fusecollective.com> <85882852-F949-44B1-B9D2-3ADEE37B9075@tink.ws> <061AF6ED-8806-4756-A7F5-1D4FCAE54B9D@tink.ws> In-Reply-To: <061AF6ED-8806-4756-A7F5-1D4FCAE54B9D@tink.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIHu+xWtRnctpy1Za9UclzRPAuM+sWNI9Nhup8JkprGIs7NkKqI55hBBnzqu3MgZpLKOX5 It looks fine to me. BTW. Over state did not have different gradient color. Only stroke color was changed from grey to white. W dniu 2012-06-01 14:35, Tink pisze: > I've just took a look at the buttons and I can export as FXG no problem, but these will create a button for each colour all with multiple colours inside them and some not so readable FXG. > > When creating skins I generally try and get a designer to stick to one base color for each, and then use and combination of white/black/alpha gradients and blend modes, filters etc to create the other states. You can then have 1 skin for all buttons and we can re-use it setting its base colour using chromeColor. > > The skins for the steps would also be very alike, really simplifying the code, and also making the code much more dynamic a flexible. > > I was wondering whether you might want to take a look at creating the buttons state like this Thomasz? At the moment instead of using a base color with white/black/alpha gradients and blendModes, all gradients are coloured there is a deferent set for each state. Event though this is the case, and the over state uses different colours in its gradient, they are so close to the up gradients that you don't see any change on rollover. > > What I've done if re-created the up and down states as best I could using the technique I mentioned above. There is a state missing compared to the FLA provided, due to the fact that although the colours are ever so slightly different, you can not see it with the eye so I have left it out, which now means the just see the base colour background for this state. > > Here's a link to what they look like at the moment http://tink.ws/apache/makebuilder_ui_skins.html (right click for the source). > > The first column matches the states in the FLA (with the missing state on over), but I thought this look kind of strange when you clicked, so I've also added a second colour that used the down state for over, and just show the base colour when down. > > Any thoughts, what do you think Thomasz? > > Tink > -- Tomasz MaciÄ…g www.fusecollective.com