Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A10FD1A6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94414 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 06:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94194 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 06:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94168 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2012 06:13:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:13:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.71.197.123] (HELO mail.mhh-solartechnik.de) (212.71.197.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:13:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.17.32] (port=8964 helo=merlin.mhhsonne.local) by mail.mhh-solartechnik.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sk7y2-0001fg-1v for flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:12:38 +0200 Received: from merlin.mhhsonne.local ([fe80::9d58:fe24:b0ea:d4f6]) by merlin.mhhsonne.local ([fe80::9d58:fe24:b0ea:d4f6%14]) with mapi; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:12:37 +0200 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0205.4FEBF5D6.0113,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 From: Frank Morawietz To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:12:37 +0200 Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs? Thread-Topic: AW: AW: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs? Thread-Index: Ac1TyEYSRFpjtGMyS+6en57HbOpvJQAbsRwgAA/b0gcAAl17MAABVmIEAAAOmJAAAPRkUAAauGWA Message-ID: <1E6C5E40E73B2942A28A1AE53A809DBE0590BF8800@merlin.mhhsonne.local> References: <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072D13B6DAA@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Alex, Since you asked for opinions: we are using maven and flexmojos to build our= sources, a 'completely' mavenized build including playerglobal and airglo= bal swcs and would help a lot. All the best -- frank Btw, thanks to Christofer for all the work! -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:22 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: Distinguishing Adobe from Apache SDKs? On 6/27/12 10:00 AM, "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" wrote: > Hi,=20 >=20 > I think you got me wrong on the company repo thing. > The repo is not public. It's just for usage inside the company. So I don'= t > think this should be a problem. > It's just something everybody will have to do over and over again. I will check, but I think that even internal company re-deployment requires an agreement from Adobe. What I'm more curious to hear from others on the list is whether this is going to be a hurdle for adoption. If having Adobe publish Maven-friendly stuff is going to make it tons easier, then I will push to make it happen. >=20 > And I was suggesting to volunteer to publish the artifacts for Apache ...= so > if they have something new > Apache could offer their services to do it for them, if they want this to > happen. Did you mean "Apache" in the first sentence? I was expecting that part of Apache Flex's release process would eventually include deploying Maven-friendly stuff. >=20 --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui