Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5A6A983F for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 00:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51613 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 00:18:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51581 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 00:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51573 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2012 00:18:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 00:18:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.29] (HELO exprod6og112.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 00:18:30 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob112.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT6B9QL3YK8V3a4IsQxosWuuGusQIEa3H@postini.com; Tue, 01 May 2012 17:18:10 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q420FwJ0012800; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q420I8vm025398; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Tue, 1 May 2012 17:18:07 -0700 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" , "jeffry@dot-com-it.com" Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 17:18:04 -0700 Subject: Re: [MENTORS] Handling Adobe Binaries Thread-Topic: [MENTORS] Handling Adobe Binaries Thread-Index: Ac0n9dBfwAwyJNudTDaTkuPLi5Vm7AAAzoeF Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4FA077B0.9060503@dot-com-it.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/1/12 4:54 PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote: > It shouldn't violate copyright; because we are writing our own code > from scratch. Unless Adobe wants to claim copyright on the API which is > possible. I know I read about a API related lawsuit at one point, but I > have no idea what the results were. Again, I'm not a lawyer, but here's my logic: If we were writing actual code that did something, then I would agree, starting from scratch shouldn'= t be a violation of copyright. But to try to create an exact replica of an API is to me the equivalent of hearing a song, but not having the sheet music, re-creating the song exactly. I don't think you can do that in the music business. --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui