Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6024C8DF for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 17:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71753 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2012 17:52:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71723 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2012 17:52:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71715 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2012 17:52:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:52:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:52:21 +0000 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so2150045wer.6 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 10:52:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=QsdKQ03dNd6AYzq6JUtokQg2uXesbOvCGT4SgYe+0R4=; b=INKsa2QVDremLFRZV4+33cN7BWUSCOv/tG0OceEwgArIZIvvP9ro24zapqmzD+d52Y BePMjuU07/DKihSExaBmZQOG6eWn641acrg3sDF1Q4cpCpng+Mq6x3SXx4mPBK/j0bBB 25pjRqN4XOYBzt2iDK9E0MCETqu5eIjDAO0NIKH2ujrM+uOhs1HtOhD59F6qM2t/pMu2 p2Q/S0NRVbuMsygt4CAAglg9VxGZO6qGOjYeC+4CBW0jz0uYpsXv2vFaNeIE0/j5RANS KPtCeKx7uI8Eu5O8IqwT4IxkW3uguNudzSaH3uz14PMC1Td7kGA/SkUojG2Wctbxu0XD USQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.91.10 with SMTP id ca10mr8400347wib.17.1336153921079; Fri, 04 May 2012 10:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.192.150 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:52:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 18:52:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FalcoJs From: filippo dipisa To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c093ed4caf004bf399303 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnX2NOF5oAscS6rxLh6vJo33+x9KEoYKZcE1LstgozvbQPjfQvdwopn8s7RZIqYiCJAs0G --f46d043c093ed4caf004bf399303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So basically at the moment, everyone can start whatever and then the board decides if integrate it into a candidate release or not, right? Doing like that there could be a duplicate work, for example I could start work on implementing Generic and maybe there is another team doing it. How can I know what's going on? Thanks for your help On 4 May 2012 18:37, Michael A. Labriola wrote: > >I understand, but could be useful also vote before writing the code no? > >For example i could write 10 user stories and then If I see that nobody > likes them I don't event start to implement them. > > You are absolutely free to do so and get people's opinions of them. I was > simply saying there isn't an organized 'apache flex' set of user stories. > --f46d043c093ed4caf004bf399303--