incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Apache Flex 4.8, playerglobal.swc versions, FP 11.x adoption, FP versions & security
Date Wed, 23 May 2012 23:33:02 GMT



On 5/23/12 1:07 PM, "Raju Bitter" <r.bitter.mailinglists@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> I have a few questions regarding the target player for the 4.8 SDK,
> the -swf-version option, playerglobal.swc version, etc. I'd be
> thankful for any input.
> 
> 1) Apache Flex 4.8 and target-player option
> I've read in the Adobe Flex 4.6 docs, that the minimum value for the
> -target-player option is 11.1 with that version of the SDK:
> http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf69084-7e
> e0.html
> 
> Wouldn't it be technically possible to compile a pure AS3 application
> for a target player with a lower version number? I assume that the 4.8
> release will require Flash Player 11.1 as well, is that right?
Yes, a lower number should be possible for pure AS3 apps.  The parity
release will be tied to FP 11.1 and SWF version 14.

> 
> 2) -swf-version option
> I guess that option refers to the SWF file format documented here:
> http://www.adobe.com/devnet/swf.html
> 
> I remember that Alex Harui said that the SWF file format version has
> not changed with recent updates of the SDK. Is there a use case where
> a value different than "10" should be used for this option?
It refers to the APIs available to ActionScript and a few code paths in the
rendering pipeline.

> 
> 3) playerglobal.swc
> Which versions of the playerglobal.swc can be used with Apache Flex 4.8?
Only 11.1 is official.  You can try using others if you want.

> 
> 4) FP 11.1, 11.2, 11.3 adoption
> Does anyone have any up-to-date numbers on the Flash Player adoption
> rate for these versions of FP? Which versions of Flash Player do you
> currently target in your applications, especially for consumer apps?
I believe Adobe generally says it takes 3 to 6 months to get 90%
penetration.  But I know that some folks targeting education find that those
computers are still stuck on 10.2.

> 
> 5) Flash Player versions and security
> Is it technically less secure to load and run an SWF in FP which
> targets the FP 10.x, compared to SWFs compiled for FP 11.x - or the
> latest version of FP. I'd say that it doesn't make a difference, since
> bugs and security holes are fixed within FP, but maybe that's not
> correct.
In general, Adobe applies security fixes to all SWF versions.  We will
default to 14 for 4.8, but I would expect most folks to be running 11.2 or
11.3 in practice.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Mime
View raw message