incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Reddin <gred...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AW: [MENTORS] Binary Files
Date Thu, 31 May 2012 14:55:46 GMT
I'll try to find some time to analyze this deeper to day and get back
with a more definitive response.

Thanks,
Greg

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/31/12 9 :22AM, "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de"
> <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
>>"Having a similar setup for Flex would be ok IMO: download binaries from
>>trusted sources by default, but allow people to supply their own binaries
>>if they want."
>>
>>It would also make the step of mavenizing a SDK release obsolete. I would
>>definitely vote for this (If I'm allowed a vote) ;-)
>>I too would suggest to avoid binary dependencies. The problem is that
>>Adobe patched quite a lot of Jars so substituting them with the default
>>ones doesn't seem possible. And Adobe even stated that they will not
>>publish their changes as the changes are far too ugly to be published.
>
> I believe you are talking about the velocity, batik and xerces changes.
> The source of all these changes will be in the Flex src kit so the
> modified jars are build as part of the Flex build.
>
>
>>So mabe it is neccesary to distribute some libs in binary form, but I
>>would assume that it would be better to check if it is actually nessecary
>>to have patched versions at all ... I would assume that these patches
>>were needed because of bugs in the third party modules and are eventually
>>fixed or adobe used them third party libs wrong (Just an assumption).
>
> From my brief look at the changes it looks like we added some extended
> functionality which the devs didn't believe were general purpose enough to
> be contributed back to Apache.
>
> Carol
>>
>

Mime
View raw message