incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug McCune <>
Subject Re: FalcoJs
Date Fri, 04 May 2012 22:17:09 GMT
>  it is not 100% factually incorrect.

:) True, my wording was too harsh for sure, I retract "100%". But my point
was that the blog post wording originally was such that it very much made
it sound like FalconJS was going to live or die based solely on Apache Flex
team, whereas in reality at this point in time only Adobe has anything at
all to do with FalconJS ever seeing the light of day. And the updated
wording still partially sounded the same.

> This is a developer's blog.  It is not an official statement.

For better or worse, that blog post is the first link on google when
searching for FalconJS, and I can't find anything more official from Adobe,
and Adobe is still in control of the code. I'd say that's as official a
source as there is, and it's more official than anything posted on an
Apache Flex wiki until the code actually lives in Apache Flex.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message