Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 255EB92D9 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22797 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 22:08:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22768 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2012 22:08:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22760 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2012 22:08:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:08:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.185] (HELO exprod6og103.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:08:13 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob103.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT5ckN3OaJ25ZDM7j4Nrzbj8oVq1IJMoQ@postini.com; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:07:53 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q3OM5hJ0001862 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q3OM0Qvw025471 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:02:03 -0700 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:02:01 -0700 Subject: Re: Flex 4 layout feature and DisplayObjectContainer Thread-Topic: Flex 4 layout feature and DisplayObjectContainer Thread-Index: Ac0iUxIzSiwYukB/Rp+lU4pcLUSoTwAEs3iE Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.11.0.110726 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 On 4/24/12 12:46 PM, "pepe.fxug@gmail.com" wrote: > Hello >=20 > Long time ago, I asked Matt Chotin about Flex 4 layout feature. > And he answered, in future release of Flex (6 or later), they tried to > remove DisplayObjectContainer from layout components. Because we use > HBox/VBox so much complexly and it doesn not need that each HBox/VBox > are DisplayObjectContainer. >=20 > Did Adobe share with Apache about the future view of Flex including this? >=20 UIComponent is based on Sprite which is a DisplayObjectContainer. I'm not sure how we'd eliminate a dependency on DisplayObjectContainer or why it would help. Can you clarify? --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui