Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A643C9E94 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48333 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 17:30:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48289 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 17:30:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48279 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 17:30:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:30:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:30:19 +0000 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so1007101wer.6 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=U/Ovo7wRS5VfontymaEq//beEIlnx6plTT5y18XdyxE=; b=JiEcyVmUhwLPaL7Ccibvdib3URxP+u/H0eUZwA7Z2BE4Em9PPira2+uu4RtLHuWd5+ zWj7Snm+RCWW7Uv56iFhRi9Rv1Lyut1r+Zgoo2iOI12kV9kNUJLZgKVwyTU9OzUjXMCQ LYlzxPH8RUK9WLaGdgWrT8A5mZnC6ItYLgOXgNRBh0wbz1pVx3oTV2JpRQ5hyS4Om++y eN3YL3f1ho2iXGzw5Bdv62679hOrSp+X9L9WFawkT3c1whPogFv6f6wVIEUploUhmbW+ o1AJyumFCwtp7tDjlwZw4Lev4xStXDYfOnGI+b7ksTfPIPRwAZxK22qPtoh74bk063Jm +G2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.102.101 with SMTP id fn5mr6736178wib.6.1333646998081; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.5.5 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1333609450.67573.YahooMailNeo@web130106.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <0AED1687-C22E-42D3-9A1B-541774C646AC@gmail.com> <4F7D805F.8040708@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:29:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: flex breakdown From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444ef4393911c04bcf1e35a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0444ef4393911c04bcf1e35a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > - A lot of people don't need UIComponent and other framework stuff. IE. a > great number of SDK users are not at all interested... > > - Most of Flex users don't need the sources, neither Java nor AS... > > ...and a lot of users wouldn't even know the difference. > > So, looking at it from end user perspective, the vast majority of users > need: > This is all conjecture, unless you have personally polled every single Flex and AS3 developer in the world these statements shouldn't be used to try and justify decisions. Unless you can back them up with hard data it just makes it sound like you are trying really hard to convince someone of something that may or may not be true. Let's stick to providing better reasoning based on cold hard facts rather than assumptions and conjecture, it'll make decision making easier for everyone. Just my opinion. -omar --f46d0444ef4393911c04bcf1e35a--