Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CBA355E6.3EB71%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <EB6F7A48D477254EAB8F675582F80CD726733C16@DPSBS1.digitalprimates.local>
	<CBA355E6.3EB71%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:04:48 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vt-+=zXM7GMkVLapNH=onxXtP9oXX0B1AYpGLiVnAewmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC - additional registerClassAlias
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d58aebef207b04bcf4e390

--0016e6d58aebef207b04bcf4e390
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 4/5/12 1:55 PM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labriola@digitalprimates.net>
> wrote:
>
> > What would everyone
> > think about further modifying the compiler to add registrations for the
> basic
> > types in the startup of Flex apps?
> I would put the additional registration calls in the class initializer for
> VectorCollection.  If you aren't using it, you shouldn't have to pay for
> the
> registration.
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>
This would be a great change. To take this line of thinking further though,
perhaps we shouldn't make people pay for the registration just for using
VectorCollection either, or just Vector. Maybe the registerClassAlias()
calls should go in ByteArray.readObject()?

-omar

--0016e6d58aebef207b04bcf4e390--