Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D15DD9E0D for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67569 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 18:58:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67540 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 18:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67522 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 18:58:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:58:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:58:41 +0000 Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so1363075wgb.0 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:58:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MIQ6SbtG2C53nkpr9uLnlwZ0Y9nud7zG9BGgYnzZDiE=; b=y85O8hYyo/iMoZCqem2nH3CukcIEbi492PQEDSzNCSJmSemFUIq/U46yHgjjbbYug0 2icCiX9XoHZ0tZQM7sj/aXTC6j5G8jYsuCdOFA9B51aNvfSPNB4YvY4DXzGCtuO61pGc iQD+Bn6S/PvqsfyMEgC1IxMkArxCYLoc4PXDpizf+STDc2SkpHDI8R73nq7NNMSCIpE7 P+FjGnDUEYWZhq10pLzMH9k3XNjHA74If1b3anUhGIKV0f+OBRl499zrSAKrY6Gfzx9p QqAD1Tehn1tJ4d2kvCEt/1nD4ARkKDfy5Pc1Ub5h3nKUzjPnm4LWvIvz44DDGcP5mi8f haaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.137.156 with SMTP id y28mr2324482wei.61.1333652300807; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.5.5 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:58:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1333609450.67573.YahooMailNeo@web130106.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <0AED1687-C22E-42D3-9A1B-541774C646AC@gmail.com> <4F7D805F.8040708@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:58:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: flex breakdown From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cf80a4bcd804bcf31f42 --00504502cf80a4bcd804bcf31f42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Left Right wrote: > Omar, you are confusing the target users with the developers. You can't > poll the developers about what do they think the users of their software > think. I mean, ok, you can, but what's the point if you can ask the users > firsthand? > Well first off, any polls that have been already done on other sites are based on Adobe Flex. We now have the ability to change things sans Adobe, so opinions on the Adobe SDK and how it was run in the past are no longer valid. Second, we do not yet have any Apache Flex releases, so polling users of our SDK, and how we decide to deploy our SDK, are solely based on precedent set by Adobe. I will go out on a limb here and say we will most likely be changing or adding to many of the aspects of the project that we couldn't in the passed. Some people have suggested adding Gradle support, Maven, etc, these are all things that are possible now being discussed on this list. Which leads me to the third thing which is that I am not confusing end users with SDK developers. However, we do have a flex-users mailing list that is not yet very busy because we have not released any SDK versions for that mailing list to comment on. > > I just offered to run more polls. I know the leader of UFUG / RFUG and can > ask them to host the poll on their site (they, by coincidence, are working > on yet another AS3 editor, so they may be interested to know that as well). > Facebook Flash usergroup and so on... > There's nothing special required to post the poll on as.org / > kirupa.comand similar - why, if that's such a debatable issue - why > not do it? > > You can run as many polls as you want on other sites. However, I go back to this Apache saying: "If it didn't happen on the list, it didn't happen." This includes, Kirupa, Facebook, Twitter, as.org, etc, etc, etc. So when it comes time to making decisions the polls done on other sites should not and will not have any bearing on decisions made by this community in this mailing list. > By the way. Some more statistics - as I've been for a few years moderating > another resource dedicated to AS / Flash / Flex, I can tell that the number > of overall questions asked that concern Flex is, possibly, 1/10 of all > questions, but the number of questions that imply that the poster is using > Flex compiler is, at least, double of that. > If my own experience is not enough - I can ask as.org moderators about > that, or kirupians :) You can check that on stackoverflow too. > > Best. > > Oleg > I am not really interested in looking to try and build consensus by browsing and searching Kirupa, as.org or StackOverflow. Our community is here, not there. And that's the last I'll say on this thread. -omar@apache.org --00504502cf80a4bcd804bcf31f42--