Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of taytay@taytay.com designates
 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANj_=iedKFfE0aYS9xB5eORap78=apA+-kqxbjq9YXKuZ7pFBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHxs0kZwZ8hTgkf69fMLgMbAOm+pk=CFPvun7VJ4+bjvKgsP3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABKMyiFhf9LjSMZ3JbdxM83hbUwWz6NR+WRiNeJY8oBPmL4Pcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKGoP_KctUaP2Fh4H4PhBGm+G4QZELQxyhGsomWfNaD4fnqN8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1AEB832A-B50A-471E-AC60-8805088FA906@gmail.com>
 <CANj_=icKB7PzV6LqZDWqju49jHu29e85o+Bbwse=Habf2YSkhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+W8zUOTfkK6=fFGgxUZJR1WnyZ_Rr3SRVWZdS0+KDE1uU7aVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAnCuG89Vs73aHvoK1RyEG1SLf5TtSiBN58ozZv5DzCLSpAHGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHxs0kb9Mb-knL-Pwv8nEXHh372Piur5CRdNcM1R9Ebyat3fkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANj_=iedKFfE0aYS9xB5eORap78=apA+-kqxbjq9YXKuZ7pFBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Taylor Brown <taytay@taytay.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:40:23 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CABjjfoE-Y+ppT2F7cV2Q1rTMeDz_UG0W=F3V7WxaMi4TEfFosg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Angular JS ( Finally the JS project that comes close to Flex! ).
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044287a6a373b404be96cfc6

--f46d044287a6a373b404be96cfc6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On a related note, here's a great website that shows an implementation of a
simple TODO list in what appears to be each of the popular JS MV*
frameworks:
http://addyosmani.github.com/todomvc/

   - Taylor

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:06 AM, James Ong <yanlilei64@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes
>
> My impression was that binding was a little verbose, although, it prove t=
o
> be faster
> than EmberJS and include the ability to defer data update to the
> presentation layer
> to improve the performance.
>
> What I dislike about KO is it feel a little restricted in the way how its
> coding expecially
> the "observable" with default data and for some reason, it didn't work th=
e
> way I expect.
> I guess it design for Windows developers.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:44 PM, ganaraj p r <ganarajpr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I havent explored Knockout much, but as far as I can tell, it allows yo=
u
> to
> > only declare two way bindings.
> >
> > Angular seems to do much more. It is actually a HTML compiler. It allow=
s
> > you to create widgets and higher level components as MXML does. You can
> > check out tab navigator implementation on angular's homepage. I followe=
d
> > the same principles and wrote my own accordion just for the heck of it.
> You
> > can check it out here  https://github.com/ganarajpr/accordion
> >
> > I am not sure knockout allows you to define something like this.
> Actually,
> > I dont know of any JS framework or otherwise that allows you to
> completely
> > declare an accordion or a tab navigator component without yourself
> writing
> > a single like of JS. With angular, apparently its possible and that is
> > powerful!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:42 AM, John Fletcher <fletchgqc@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > good summary of such frameworks
> > >
> >
> http://codebrief.com/2012/01/the-top-10-javascript-mvc-frameworks-reviewe=
d/
> > >
> > > El 26 de abril de 2012 09:31, Cosma Colanicchia <cosmacol@gmail.com
> > > >escribi=F3:
> > >
> > > > AngularJS is really, really interesting, thanks for the tip.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/4/26 James Ong <yanlilei64@gmail.com>:
> > > > > @Igor, Angular and Knockout are interesting. I been experimenting
> > > > KnockOut
> > > > > which is more like Flex declarative syntax, only Angular make cod=
e
> > > > cleaner,
> > > > > dependency injection and compact than any other libraries I can
> find.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Sanford Redlich <
> > siredlich@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> A good friend recommended ember.js as the future of rails
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sent from my iPhone, 415-254-7288
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Apr 25, 2012, at 2:54 PM, "Igor G." <i.gaidai4uk@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > If you are interested in this kinda stuff checkout knockout.js
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:48 PM, aYo ~ <ayo@binitie.com> wrote=
:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> I am checking it out - looks and feels interesting
> > > > >> >> ~a~
> > > > >> >> www.ayobinitie.com
> > > > >> >> http://mrbinitie.blogspot.com
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> On 25 April 2012 10:50, ganaraj p r <ganarajpr@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>> Anyone seem the new kid on the block? Its a new JS library
> which
> > > > allows
> > > > >> >> you
> > > > >> >>> to make HTML work like our Flex MXML.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Its pretty exciting. Imagine writing Flex MXML directly in t=
he
> > > > browser?
> > > > >> >> and
> > > > >> >>> the browser understanding it? This is the closest thing I ha=
ve
> > > seen
> > > > to
> > > > >> >> Flex
> > > > >> >>> in the JS world ( I havent checked out Ext JS! ).
> > > > >> >>> Worth checking it out!
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> http://www.angularjs.org
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> --
> > > > >> >>> Regards,
> > > > >> >>> Ganaraj P R
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Ganaraj P R
> >
>

--f46d044287a6a373b404be96cfc6--