Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A84995F5 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5586 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 15:12:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5548 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2012 15:12:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 5540 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2012 15:12:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:12:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.237.132.80] (HELO wp073.webpack.hosteurope.de) (80.237.132.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:12:11 +0000 Received: from pd95c27.osaknt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp ([111.217.92.39] helo=[192.168.1.21]); authenticated by wp073.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1SFoLm-0007xL-60; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4F7DB62C.3050505@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:11:40 +0900 From: Martin Heidegger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Flex References: <4F7DA6A0.5060501@leichtgewicht.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;mh@leichtgewicht.at;1333638731;2b2f10fa; Again: I am not sure what you are all talking about :) ExternalInterface works fine for certain tasks. What do you want to do ?! yours Martin. On 05/04/2012 23:44, Bradley Slavik wrote: > I cannot imagine how this would work. Also, the syntax of jQuery is > inconsistent. If there > were any effort in this direction I would help with MooTools which is a > more consistent, > better written, if lesser known Javascript extension. > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Alain Ekambiwrote: > >> Native Flex (AS3/MXML) integration with JS has never been easy (External >> Interface is a big pain). >> This is one of the reasons we went the GWT way with Flex since it gave us >> esay JS Integration with Flex. >> >> >> 2012/4/5 Martin Heidegger >> >>> I'd love to hear more about what approach you would suggest. >>> >>> yours >>> Marttin. >>> >>> >>> On 05/04/2012 22:04, Swix Company wrote: >>> >>>> Hi There, >>>> >>>> I would like to propose that Flex be compatible with jQuery. It will go >> a >>>> long way of helping develop RIA. >>>> I would like to know what your thoughts are on this idea. >>>> >>>>