Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version;
  b=FGkLDVXX6oEi0VfW1FApJi+ynQcCOxIlL7agRuskBalKVu+C9oWHDZjUZQ3WAvW7nbjzNE4ORwygKrg5qX28MOPm4lTteItZIE9R/SN9D9giYkC5BTmsCvhnPNIXKHRS3a/GOpMorxKZbtEeLPivXBWcAc7ByMx/6s8TxOPuLWg=
  ;
Subject: Re: Database support for Adobe AIR
References: 
 <CAHtV0bB=mwwoJ778Exqhf4tmHgNNLn3xMqxJZKF=wSN8KiFjRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEFz_vsrwdDr1=nFoMe0_9Qz1cze-bkLNj4kFPjhfBsRFb5NJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1333515888.77530.YahooMailNeo@web130102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <CAEFz_vuaiFFmVQXcuD2awDBNYeA8rA-tmzU6G1JM-Ww8Cbkchg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F7BE1E2.7020802@leichtgewicht.at>
 <CAEFz_vtvq4=L07v8PbDCotsxhEnjdvgW1T9YwLWiUZ1aTyJY1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ariel Jakobovits <arieljake@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEFz_vtvq4=L07v8PbDCotsxhEnjdvgW1T9YwLWiUZ1aTyJY1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <03A5AFCD-4DB6-4CB7-9C82-7E0768FC5B35@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:16:29 -0700
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

Well, then can we agree that your initial response to the poster that his co=
mment did not belong on this list because we are not developing AIR was not a=
 appropriate response?

I'm not arguing for the sake of arguing. I'm making sure we don't send peopl=
e packing because we don't understand their initial post, and don't turn awa=
y ideas that might be an important part of the still uncertain future of fle=
x.


On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:56 PM, Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com> wrote=
:

> On Tuesday, April 3, 2012, Martin Heidegger wrote:
>=20
>> On 04/04/2012 14:21, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
>>=20
>>> ... whether we should be developing ANEs for the Flex framework, etc.
>>>=20
>>=20
>> I think that topic can be handled like any other topic: If someone is
>> interested working on it: Let them. I do not see a reason to veto on it.
>> There are already air specific classes in the sdk.
>>=20
>> yours
>> Martin.
>>=20
>=20
> I wasn't vetoing or suggesting that ANEs be vetoed. I was saying we haven'=
t
> reached a consensus about including ANEs in Apache Flex and nobody has
> contributed one for us to vote on or veto.
>=20
> -omar