incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Coleman <david_coleman_...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: combo box
Date Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:45:58 GMT

sure give me a few days to dedicate some time to this example, I'm up to my eyeballs in work
for the next 48 or so!

my github user is davidcoleman007 and I'll share something asap!

> From: flex@tink.ws
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: combo box
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:43:10 +0100
> 
> On 10 Apr 2012, at 18:40, David Coleman wrote:
> 
> >
> > Yes and no.  with this you can set the actual emptyItemValue to be  
> > whatever you want.  For instance if you have some complex set of  
> > dto's etc, you can set the emptyItemValue to be an actual object and  
> > have it be able to work more seamlessly with other parts of the  
> > logic.  There are quite a few edge cases where you might want to  
> > distinguish the empty item by some value other than -1, but still  
> > represent the selectedIndex as -1 for compatibility with the  
> > framework.
> 
> Just so everyone fully understands (including myself) it would be good  
> to see an example of what your after, and then an example of your  
> implementation, hosted on github or something for the time being.
> 
> Tink	   		
> 
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message