incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Haykel BEN JEMIA <hayke...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RT] Voting Result was [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:35:17 GMT
It is actually a modification of existing code. In an earlier e-mail [1],
Martin said: 'This vote concerns just the existing components.'.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/uhg2rtigcnljm4ii

Haykel




On 3 April 2012 16:01, Jeff Tapper <jeff@spoon.as> wrote:

> As its not a modification of existing code, but a proposed mod on a future
> release, Im not sure this qualifies.  Can one of the mentors weigh in on
> this?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:mh@leichtgewicht.at]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 10:46 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RT] Voting Result was [VOTE][FLEX-7] package
> "org.apache.flex"
>
> On 03/04/2012 23:17, Jeff Tapper wrote:
> > By my reading of the rules, the first issue passes and the 2nd fails.
> > As this wasn't about a commit to the trunk, I don't think the -1's are
> > a veto, but a +3 would be required to pass, correct?
>
> The rules say on "code modification" - changing the packages is certainly a
> code modification, isn't it?
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message