incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Winscot <rick.wins...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [MENTORS] Handling Adobe Binaries
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:33:27 GMT
Is this not a clear case where playerglobal.swc could be 'stubbed-out' to side-step the dependency?

On Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 4/26/12 6:09 AM, "olegsivokon@gmail.com (mailto:olegsivokon@gmail.com)" <olegsivokon@gmail.com
(mailto:olegsivokon@gmail.com)> wrote:
> 
> > On the other hand, playerglobal.swc library isn't a separate product
> > distributed by Adobe.
> > 
> 
> It can be downloaded from the FlashPlayer page.
> > 
> > I mentioned this problem before, but the discussion got carried away in a
> > different direction, so I'll repeat. It is possible to completely replace
> > playerglobal.swc with an alternative, although it will take time to write
> > it and there would be a chance of it being misaligned with the real player
> > API, but it would ultimately solve all possible licensing issues.
> > 
> 
> I'll ask legal about this, but it might fall under the reverse engineering
> restriction.
> 
> -- 
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> 
> 



Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message