incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeff Tapper" <j...@spoon.as>
Subject RE: [RT] Voting Result was [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:01:52 GMT
As its not a modification of existing code, but a proposed mod on a future
release, Im not sure this qualifies.  Can one of the mentors weigh in on
this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:mh@leichtgewicht.at] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 10:46 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] Voting Result was [VOTE][FLEX-7] package "org.apache.flex"

On 03/04/2012 23:17, Jeff Tapper wrote:
> By my reading of the rules, the first issue passes and the 2nd fails.  
> As this wasn't about a commit to the trunk, I don't think the -1's are 
> a veto, but a +3 would be required to pass, correct?

The rules say on "code modification" - changing the packages is certainly a
code modification, isn't it?

yours
Martin.


Mime
View raw message