Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D37E992F2 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75862 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2012 00:26:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75832 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2012 00:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75823 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2012 00:26:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:26:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of roren007@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:25:56 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so3072667obq.6 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:25:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gX/4GjMqD1c0ZOh2QDMpI14SghvnamGFttBe6z1TcBE=; b=vzI1YVxoNrrrZSSTBRvST8ad1KUJqGIq+xZwGPuQXhws938cBYnR8EAN/OHjvHUaDE EjW77/zcFmC9TrHJ5XA5VkCKmBCIva4UMsUZzEyF4RDsI6N+Ni9xAKqsbHw9LnlIMwI5 Gjet5zlmF4/ZQRgAg9UJQk8um23VYhGTPnND9BZBFZzVjZt1ObcKGHixOCptZV6PV5jt wdBYberjUdbmwVI0lgQDHSMqhVAa5B7d5jDLNCWnRU6Zpj+gPoeneupSSZ2ybm8J9G3W 2AWkXNvYII9YYEZAPrEgXFOJQP7s1x616wLB1lK0D4D/mCpWW8zG2Vujl9i0t6ve1ImU rZ5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.179.68 with SMTP id de4mr17298385obc.13.1332548735878; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.125.165 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:25:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:25:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Halo x Spark From: Richard Oren To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f6433a00c474c04bbf22e20 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f6433a00c474c04bbf22e20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not sure what you were trying to do... but with a little bit of research you should have been able to still use Flex 4 for your project. There is a learning curve to get behind the concept so I have felt your pain before but if you stick with it it does get somewhat easier. I have had to resort back to OLD school ways and Draw a lot of graphical stuff for Mobile Development with the Drawing API, but for desktop stuff you should be able to go with MXML. http://blog.flexexamples.com/2009/11/04/setting-a-custom-horizontal-scroll-= bar-skin-on-a-spark-list-control-in-flex-4/ Hang in there! You can Do it! :) On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Cortlandt Winters wr= ote: > Hi Will, > > I do have a prediction. And it's not a dire one. > > It's true what you say, but though this is an area that the flex > components most need some TLC in, I'm confident that it's the one area th= at > it's most likely to get it. > > As for predictions, I predict that Adobe will do what it said it will do > and it will leave Flex "5?" in a pretty stable state. It will take some > time for folk to get familiar with the apache process and the framework a= nd > to determine how to deal with scrolling on mobile apps that have a whole > new level of performance requirement, but that there are going to be plen= ty > of opportunities to make both web based apps easy to skin and mobile ones > performant. > > The toughest part about taking flex and making it open source is that mos= t > flex users are not component developers, they are end user app developers= , > but as far as folk that are comfortable with styling and skinning there > should be a lot of easily available expertise to create a good system. > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Williams Farias >wrote: > > > Greatings everyone, > > > > I=B4d like to know why does Spark skining is so dificult to get a simpl= e > > result. > > > > I=B4m building now a web application and I need just to skin the Scroll= Bar. > > Ok, in Flex3 i just open my Flash CS5, create a new Symbol and "Export > for > > actionscript". Then i just add 4 new lines in my CSS style code, and it= s > > done. I have now a simple and 2 minuts made scrollbar. > > > > But in Spark component... ohhh, what a brutal work i=B4d had to take... > > create a new Style... and put everything on the code... ohhh man, thats= a > > really waste of time with hundreds of codes lines and without a design > > interface to see how it looks like... in my opinion its too much work f= or > > such a little result! > > > > Just because of that scrollbar man, i had to decide to use Flex 3 inste= d > of > > 4!!! A simple and mediocre scrollbar skin! > > > > I was wondering: how can the most simple thing to do in Flex could be > > transformed in a bunch of lines and hard work as that scrolllBar skin? > > > > If i could propose something to chance in the next releases of Flex, is= a > > mix of Halo and Spark Skins. I think that Flex3 skinning is much more > > simple and intelligent to do. > > > > Antoher thing that frightened me was to read that Adobe will not update > > more the Design View of Flash Builder! Does Apacge group have any > > prediction about this? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Williams Farias > > > --e89a8f6433a00c474c04bbf22e20--