Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 495FF9E9D for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77732 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 03:21:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77655 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 03:21:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77619 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2012 03:21:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:21:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 209.85.214.175 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rsantos@spectacompany.com.br) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:21:20 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so213622obq.6 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:21:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rsantos@spectacompany.com.br designates 10.60.12.230 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.12.230; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rsantos@spectacompany.com.br designates 10.60.12.230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rsantos@spectacompany.com.br Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.12.230]) by 10.60.12.230 with SMTP id b6mr1122238oec.54.1330572060244 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:21:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.12.230 with SMTP id b6mr971306oec.54.1330572060127; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:21:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.216.68 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:20:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9AD88C89-05FB-4BC7-A6A3-190F366EC03E@classsoftware.com> References: <20120301030707.7220F23888D2@eris.apache.org> <9AD88C89-05FB-4BC7-A6A3-190F366EC03E@classsoftware.com> From: Rafael Santos Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:20:40 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r1295396 - in /incubator/flex/whiteboard/jmclean/validators: ./ src/ src/mx/ src/mx/core/ src/mx/core/Version.as src/mx/validators/ src/mx/validators/PostCodeValidator.as src/tests/ src/tests/PostCodeValidatorTests.as To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1ce26fdf13204ba25f238 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmggPbIXZ00viHRw7degh09Ol96Pc2UQ5wNZ5Nr+G6LkSefbwNc3Tlw3MknJQM3+sjYAZw3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8ff1ce26fdf13204ba25f238 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 As long as I can remember Spark does not cover every component that exist on mx. Many components were left behind (ViewStack, Accordion, LinkButton and many others). Rafael Santos - Specta On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 00:17, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Out of curiosity, is there a reason you chose to make it an MX based > > Validator as opposed to a Spark validator? > > I find a lot of people still use mx components, there are still a fair > number of Flex 3.6 or Flex 4.x mixed mx and spark applications about. > > There still nothing in Spark that's similar to mx:Form right? > > Time permitting I'll also to put up a spark on - unless someone writes it > before me. > > Thanks, > Justin --e89a8ff1ce26fdf13204ba25f238--