Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJQBtgka9HbyuVS-8FPdyTe2_R34xFcVXS7CJmn=qWscdj207Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+W8zUNOB22-aSa0uXqnp4Uo9VycVkijsL9KVvSdnencd5UMXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F6BB7E0.3030202@thedevprocess.com>
	<CA+W8zUMAtaR9+4gSkSpaVM_8S5NmBZZx2Ny8-AH32PFs7eBVfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F6E1578.8070606@thedevprocess.com>
	<52B2F252-22C7-4375-BE97-50B8B75F0A3F@classsoftware.com>
	<E4A9CAE7-4304-4EA5-9316-65DAF229AAA1@tink.ws>
	<CAJQBtgm6frJEFuBDoG+Q40iPuK+KJSOL=9o02K9tguoSYA=d8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+W8zUMKvfdgezBYKzbjPU-uuFrkS62nsqC_CQXvikHQ8+VJKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+W8zUNuBGnZ82ATA0PZLfqeqhndZX=Sc03_aH47u7wqhuTiUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<A2A53052-37C7-4EE2-A717-A4286EF0F75B@tink.ws>
	<CA+W8zUONb9azbmB2NiRjRc3jbgUiHjZLc5Ow8W56qJ8DidK3oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALorpXfuy7Fi-n3zsmYsJwwy6BYpJMkhhPT7aBzsq2sV4Qfchw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+W8zUMTCj8FwGk-7vX4Yi+xoeU9ST_nXHuX9sHXvVB66JjMtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJQBtgk9Hm+TU_vWQYd0kqenReC=zypKcuUz88uePoTETYNusQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEFz_vsoG6mcnEqZ38mzN7XD5NWyJkCqoT8Z7BRVJK3shzWz2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJQBtgka9HbyuVS-8FPdyTe2_R34xFcVXS7CJmn=qWscdj207Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:19:48 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAAgciqptF1d0U9yEFtSHdFaXWfq9h6v4pRRb+NLVr9DTfyed+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Actionscript workers and async locking?
From: Roland Zwaga <roland@stackandheap.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f369e42678904bc27be3c

--20cf307f369e42678904bc27be3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
>
> > Suddenly you have a huge mess of callbacks you have to reorganize.
>
> No, I don't have a mess, I keep my code well organized. On the contrary,
> Spicefactory code is always a mess, from the very start and it's not
> possible to fix.
>
> What you call "very easily" is your perception of reality, because
> operating plain event handlers is, in fact, much easier then what Parsley
> offers.The very simple proof to it is the reduced code surface (when not
> using Parsley), improved intellisense (when not using Parsley), conscious
> and well accepted techniques employed for writing the code (bizarre / not
> idiomatic techniques are used in Parsley, they borrow heavily from other
> languages and environments, but are foreign to AS3 / Flash), improved
> debugging abilities (when not using Parsley).
>
> People often times want to believe every single thing written on the
> internet - Parsley advertising Parsley is just another random writing on
> the internet, as baseless and pointless as your next Myspace profile. This
> doesn't apply to Parsley exclusively. At the same measure it applies to
> every "microacitecture framework", because architecture cannot be canned in
> the form of a library that you plug to your project. You will get spaghetti
> code with or without using any "microacitecture framework" with exactly the
> same probability.


I thought this thread was about async programming and not about trashing
Parsley?
Seriously, the whole pro- or con- micro-architecture framework discussion
is rather
pointless, at the end of the day its a matter of preference.

Just my two cents...

Roland

--20cf307f369e42678904bc27be3c--