Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F70F99E4 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34133 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 13:47:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34087 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2012 13:47:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34079 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2012 13:47:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:47:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cosmacol@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.175] (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:47:36 +0000 Received: by lbbgi4 with SMTP id gi4so3792255lbb.6 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qDFUCsQ7H1sNts81xUXeAtGuFhmKKGHepvU5auL/qPQ=; b=OKNJNCd/yMPPV7xH5zNiHc5nGfa+Wy5nslZ8U3o0zLT0de20gPZC8IESdDuEGPmd8c 7f7Km5VcuBCyFpeQP4BE3+ibn2tbKiLaEg6d9BFNwL3qSgbpHuqZTjY48vRmOVPZzQb+ o28M3t+4F4LV+ZGzP8WSy6ZciYkkOnQQDC/awxVHkwum0C/s83uiE42caPm1ne6e1CP8 Ql49Rk8FExDp7X51Z9wm1HaOcgOqHYc4wXr5nMBG6p3vLlkxdp4fhI4XHsWYdJxVFuC5 Tol/mfb3mQqlrMx9qGKett3YLRcJ4QLRyFWEZZ0lme9uwdJ7enqo92EUfVdZDq1N6uNQ +CjA== Received: by 10.112.10.41 with SMTP id f9mr2803893lbb.46.1332769634623; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:47:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.109.133 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:41:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F6BB7E0.3030202@thedevprocess.com> <4F6E1578.8070606@thedevprocess.com> <52B2F252-22C7-4375-BE97-50B8B75F0A3F@classsoftware.com> From: Cosma Colanicchia Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:41:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Actionscript workers and async locking? To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org @Nicholas: now I get it, but that wasn't my suspicions, I was just reporting the docs [1] for the "single" concurrency type: "single - Making only one request at a time is allowed on the method; additional requests made while a request is outstanding are immediately faulted on the client and are not sent to the server." [1]http://help.adobe.com/it_IT/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/mx/rp= c/remoting/RemoteObject.html#concurrency Ciao, Cosma 2012/3/26 Nicholas Kwiatkowski : > That was in regard to your suspicions on how the RemoteObject class worke= d. > =C2=A0You should that if you sent it two command to process, the second w= ould > error out -- > > -Nick > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Cosma Colanicchia wr= ote: > >> @Nicholas: I suspect a misunderstanding, I was talking about the C# >> "await" (just copied and pasted from the link provided by Taylor)... >> what exactly is "that's not how I've seen it work"? >> >> >> Cosma >>