Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDDAB9D29 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26294 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 15:21:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26169 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 15:21:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26160 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2012 15:21:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:21:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.245.86] (HELO na3sys010aog109.obsmtp.com) (74.125.245.86) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:21:39 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob109.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTzU17E9yUZYH9pI8toCohAUcfX+XHesZ@postini.com; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:21:18 PST Received: by wibhm14 with SMTP id hm14so2536024wib.23 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:21:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.234 with SMTP id m84mr3137463wei.24.1328887275620; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.20.139 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:21:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F3533C7.2090808@leichtgewicht.at> References: <4F34036F.7090302@leichtgewicht.at> <4F34092B.9030607@leichtgewicht.at> <4F340F32.50004@leichtgewicht.at> <20269C1D2B00D24682F1C89E6F0A90A02B6BE1@SBOCMX001.exchad.jpmchase.net> <4F352956.4040601@leichtgewicht.at> <4F3533C7.2090808@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:21:15 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test System? From: JP Bader To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldWUMt+n9MLtZJxlkVNOGHhzfLJUc9SZo5LT2AkxYd2M2fWmODqyCTZgXwnwrr/Cm+2PWw X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Maven (and Flex Mojos)? It can be a PITA to setup/maintain, but can run Flex unit tests in a headless environment (i.e. no FP/AIR runtime installation needed, i don't believe). I've been on projects that run Maven in conjunction with CI ant scripts (Lunt, Hudson/Jenkins, et al). As a side note, it is very nice to discuss experiences of said implementations with enterprise teams, especially because when they learn that Flex can be tested repeatedly in such situations without manual intervention, similar to Java and .Net, they get a little happier (not much, but a little). JP On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: > On 11/02/2012 00:04, David Francis Buhler wrote: >> >> Is there any interest in adopting a Continuous Integration environment >> which kick off the Unit Tests, perhaps using Hudson? >> >> Note: I am unaware of the license restrictions for Hudson. > > Apache has a continuous integration server project called Continuum [1] that > seems to be quite active. > > However: testing flex could be a challenge for the admins @ apache as it > would require the AIR runtime _and_ the Flash Player to run the tests. > (Some things can just be tested using air} > > Specially running on linux servers for which the adl does not exist it might > be very tricky. > > yours > Martin. > > > [1] http://continuum.apache.org/ -- JP Bader Principal Zavteq, Inc. @lordB8r | jp@zavteq.com 608.692.2468