Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yanlilei64@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yanlilei64@gmail.com designates
 10.205.121.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.205.121.14;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F44DF0C.7070802@leichtgewicht.at>
References: <4F44A4AE.1030408@leichtgewicht.at>
	<CAJ16SzANnbyM9s9N9YLuUT+z6FiDw=NHeLdw7UWg8p_-djSDAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<B92B97DE-7A9B-4361-B270-6C96D9CB24B1@adobe.com>
	<4F44AFAB.9060002@leichtgewicht.at>
	<33487595652B444690C75E0151928A4B@KORODESKTOP>
	<009001ccf143$2c353890$849fa9b0$@davidarno.org>
	<4F44B516.7000009@leichtgewicht.at>
	<4F44DF0C.7070802@leichtgewicht.at>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:38:09 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CANj_=ifKzq=tuH=DfRDLRnvbs=nORF7skt38eTKHd9PS1kyjxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Flash Platform roadmap
From: James Ong <yanlilei64@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174023b8cf43d304b98ccc72

--0015174023b8cf43d304b98ccc72
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm quite curious on audio part, "Improved audio support for working with
low-latency audio" what support will it be available?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Martin Heidegger <mh@leichtgewicht.at>wrote:

> On 22/02/2012 18:27, Martin Heidegger wrote:
>
>> On 22/02/2012 18:20, David Arno wrote:
>>
>>> From: Dimitri k. [mailto:koro@noos.fr]
>>>> Sent: 22 February 2012 09:08
>>>>
>>>> No he was referring that future Flash Player linux version will be only
>>>>
>>> available in Google Chrome.
>>> I can't decide if that is right or not. As the Pepper API is described as
>>> "cross-platform API for plugins for web browsers," that implies that
>>> other
>>> browsers could implement it too. If it is cross-platform though, why is
>>> Adobe ditching direct support for Flash for Linux only?
>>>
>>> Sadly, it is another nail in the coffin of Flex as a Flash-based
>>> technology,
>>> no matter how one looks at it.
>>>
>>> David.
>>>
>>
>> I have been reading a little into it....
>>
>
> I found more information on the PPAPI[1]. It looks like Mozilla just
> stopped improving
> the NPAPI and focus on w3c technology (JavaScript). This development seems
> similar
> to steps Microsoft is taking in IE-Metro (by removing plugin altogether).
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
> [1] http://www.theregister.co.uk/**2010/06/25/mozilla_on_npapi_**pepper/<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/25/mozilla_on_npapi_pepper/>
>
>

--0015174023b8cf43d304b98ccc72--