Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vivek.n.gupta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00d701cce25e$6125eb60$2371c220$@davidarno.org>
References: <00d701cce25e$6125eb60$2371c220$@davidarno.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:05:04 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAN+4JMPRotEaALsTxiVemf1fLdt=YagsR7j=4POpw-_v3Ms_jw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WTF?] final vote for logo color(s) selection
From: vivek gupta <vivek.n.gupta@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b18b7a40be204b80cdd51

--bcaec51b18b7a40be204b80cdd51
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1 David

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:57 PM, David Arno <david@davidarno.org> wrote:

> Who's brilliant idea was it to divide the single colour vote across four
> viable candidates, thus ensuring the multi-coloured option easily won the
> vote? This vote couldn't have been more rigged (no doubt completely
> accidently in this case) if people had tried!
>
> How about we make the vote fair?? Either offer up four multi-coloured
> options to balance the four single-coloured ones, or change the vote to be
> simply between a multi-coloured or single-coloured logo.
>
> David.
>
>

--bcaec51b18b7a40be204b80cdd51--