Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E9BA9994 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35913 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 10:58:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35884 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 10:58:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35873 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2012 10:58:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:58:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pepe.fxug@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:58:12 +0000 Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so4300871wib.6 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:57:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of pepe.fxug@gmail.com designates 10.180.96.230 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.96.230; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pepe.fxug@gmail.com designates 10.180.96.230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pepe.fxug@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=pepe.fxug@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.96.230]) by 10.180.96.230 with SMTP id dv6mr34018172wib.11.1329908270832 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:57:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4cejhniX0EPoVcBbY8EEGrQfLw9Bs4blphTkCZp28zQ=; b=OazvTSbmUXHkQPGs+byNvfIszMWMxhfSj6In751wEJEvGV2Vake8idnck1Jz/c5+uX UTB7ZsD1Clw5YBLSIffr0Jfu9pBn8eWDMs3oiZC0m4zi0LAA1lFTnLBFvsdG/15J5qpV bbOlthrOtODWjJ2tU1mXcEH5F8zzEVrPEUH84= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.96.230 with SMTP id dv6mr28099988wib.11.1329908270748; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:57:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.104.67 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:57:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <00f901ccf150$3581abb0$a0850310$@davidarno.org> References: <00f901ccf150$3581abb0$a0850310$@davidarno.org> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:57:50 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ActionScript workers will come in the second half of 2012 with Flash Player "Dolores" From: Pepe To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, you mean that Apache Flex project develops nothing and it just keeps Flex sources, right? Shigeru Nakagaki 2012/2/22 David Arno : >> From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.fxug@gmail.com] >> Sent: 22 February 2012 10:41 >> >> This is very good news and I'm concerning about the following two things= . >> >> =A01. New Flex Framework should support ActionScript workers as a part o= f > framework. >> >> =A02. The AIR framework in Flex Framework should be re-designed with > ActionScript workers. >> >> Please add these features to Apache Flex roadmap. > > Sorry Shigeru, but Apache doesn't work like that. There is no roadmap. If > you'd like to grab yourself a copy of the code, discuss your plans here, > canvas for assistance, and then help write a new framework that makes use= of > worker threads, then great. I'm sure many would be more than willing to h= elp > you. If the result is good enough, it'll form part of a future release. > > David. >