Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexandre.madurell@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcqqYJTY-Q2S+NDopwiE7oL1dYO+fju_S9OzJJj_+SGfNU-qA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcqqYJTY-Q2S+NDopwiE7oL1dYO+fju_S9OzJJj_+SGfNU-qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:41:21 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAKeuhB2zLdgRWNKQmnd7sCFpRTVpdtzTJ+0zURDWfQV4q4scGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Starting with the Whiteboard Code
From: Alexandre Madurell <alexandre.madurell@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93405af34753f04b85fefda

--14dae93405af34753f04b85fefda
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

If that's (or will be) a vote, +1 for Alex's proposal!

About newbies and getting up to speed, I don't think that will be even
comparable to learning (Java) Spring or Hibernate, and with a good
instructor/training, it's not that difficult either. I'm all for more
configuration on the minus side if the plus side is
performance/light(er)weight components.

Alexandre

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Piotr Kawiak <piotr.kawiak@gmail.com> wrote:

> I totally agree with Alex. I am working in a large company on
> enterprise scale project with Flex GUI and I'd love 'new' Flex to be
> backwards compatible, but this sure looks like an enormous effort. In
> my company we keep using Flex 3, we didn't even switch to 4, cause it
> isn't really worth the effort (IMHO). I'd trade backwards
> compatibility for new, cleaner component architecture. If the 'core'
> stays corrupt, then I guess I'd rather keep using Flex 3.
>

--14dae93405af34753f04b85fefda--