Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC33F9B3F for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57680 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2012 13:18:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57654 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2012 13:18:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57645 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2012 13:18:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:18:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jszczepankiewicz@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:18:10 +0000 Received: by yhoo22 with SMTP id o22so146280yho.6 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jszczepankiewicz@gmail.com designates 10.50.57.163 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.57.163; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jszczepankiewicz@gmail.com designates 10.50.57.163 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jszczepankiewicz@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jszczepankiewicz@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.57.163]) by 10.50.57.163 with SMTP id j3mr17289749igq.3.1330348670148 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:17:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wg1PlcObJFEgfrZcK3IJhfqr3o7abk0TbPcB+mkXZ1U=; b=ZlhoyJnR8ALfivochyLtPBZCMJWut4v9JCKqhdXOA1ToE0/VsO4jd8lIbzId11jEHS CIidaQngVdiz8wiuxqvMZHgOs2wMyiauRAEixHxpNC9+BhFzhezN1KcpkQ417n+lYpOc 0kQdkmXKSrwYhYvEh8A9qVYHq4HMjpCCwnBaY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.57.163 with SMTP id j3mr14054118igq.3.1330348670108; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.137.10 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:17:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <006201ccf551$e4eec0b0$aecc4210$@davidarno.org> References: <002a01ccf550$04945300$0dbcf900$@davidarno.org> <006201ccf551$e4eec0b0$aecc4210$@davidarno.org> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:17:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex -> HTML, Linux and time to say goodbye? From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_Szczepankiewicz?= To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You are spreading FUD. FP will be available on google chrome at least. They will no more support old and buggy (i.e. no correct REST http codes support) NPAPI on linux. 2012/2/27 David Arno : >> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicholas@spoon.as] >> Sent: 27 February 2012 13:06 >> >> Adobe is not dumping support for Flash for Linux. > I disagree. Flash for Linux will only be available from Google, not Adobe, > and will use a plugin type that only Google supports in its browser. > Stripping away all the PR "positive spin" guff, the underlying message here > is that Adobe is dumping support for Flash on Linux. > > David. >