Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-3923-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BF449AB6
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2012 21:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 93200 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 21:17:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93145 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 21:17:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93137 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2012 21:17:07 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:17:07 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davidbuhler@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.210.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:17:02 +0000
Received: by iaby12 with SMTP id y12so7115854iab.6
        for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:16:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ZrogOO1RYOoN5/7B+AkqHPVBOy+otL0vl0DVr39BoOw=;
        b=b3ajqmNZfchrZuu4y+qtxq+2udLbUtHhWXF1bSJBrAQEvuwp+GImQ+yuBkpyLw98wM
         H/GsYk2rSAqh2VdzuZ+lEjzW/1RTmKSmxjGR9JYJ5xDJfDYGqR9e2kpmGiUZ1+Yj3P8T
         BmLUMr9cBCP92ZVpSwGzm2trS7i9/7Dim9Xro=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.202.97 with SMTP id kh1mr14564807igc.19.1328390202016; Sat,
 04 Feb 2012 13:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.187.164 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 13:16:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <03f401cce37e$de63d210$9b2b7630$@davidarno.org>
References: <03f401cce37e$de63d210$9b2b7630$@davidarno.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 16:16:42 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAH12+xPU+hinkhJeEfxZZmBo9y_p_SCAzfA_wmk3Ux4FZ-1FrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Flex 5 and non-SWF targets: Skinning
From: David Francis Buhler <davidbuhler@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

You may wish to rephrase the question around the FalconJS compiler and
the capabilities of style-support within the FalconJS compiler when
the target is HTML5.

On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, David Arno <david@davidarno.org> wrote:
> <tumbleweed/>
>
> There has been zero responses to this technical email on how we might
> progress Flex in the past 24 hours. Discussions on the minutia of logos
> would have got 10s of response in that time. This worries me. It's great
> that we have an audience ready to whoop at pretty pictures, but does this
> list actually have the technical skills to really take over the development
> of Flex?
>
> David.
>