Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C9579827 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6661 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 15:05:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6623 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2012 15:05:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6615 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2012 15:05:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:05:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davidbuhler@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:04:59 +0000 Received: by yhfq46 with SMTP id q46so1493778yhf.6 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:04:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BETeKFzRjncco8+i9NC3Yl0HP79iknVfwtdh3inRKwc=; b=sOMLMcZi2yCBJd7xiFz8fAu4bnu7Fmei+eNYNTkTxPwBoa4Ig5aJnWHbGHtOspA8G3 Zs5SnbF2+sDTtIrT0CwB0vOJZ7ApzKfigpV6UNGnJE6J7a5yi2aM2HyGcDvaGLn98tVp IOayO/gA8vfuW6Deqf9rwftELag1JFivwvvc8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.149.194 with SMTP id x2mr2812502icv.13.1328886278721; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.187.164 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:04:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F34036F.7090302@leichtgewicht.at> <4F34092B.9030607@leichtgewicht.at> <4F340F32.50004@leichtgewicht.at> <20269C1D2B00D24682F1C89E6F0A90A02B6BE1@SBOCMX001.exchad.jpmchase.net> <4F352956.4040601@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:04:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test System? From: David Francis Buhler To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is there any interest in adopting a Continuous Integration environment which kick off the Unit Tests, perhaps using Hudson? Note: I am unaware of the license restrictions for Hudson. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Martin Heidegger wrote: >> FlexUnit itself is a very generous offer which I think the PPMC should take. >> Perhaps Michael can make a submission request?... > > As it's a sizable chunk of code (I assume), note that this requires a > code grant from whoever owns that code, see > http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt - nothing > complicated but provenance and donation must be documented. > > -Bertrand