Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31B2A9E1C for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 16:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49441 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2012 16:01:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49296 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2012 16:01:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49288 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2012 16:01:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:01:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcpiresrj@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:01:14 +0000 Received: by vcdn13 with SMTP id n13so3605400vcd.6 for ; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:00:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JJr3BYCkmBD/a7/teo/geZHGOqMOMNNA3n3n/YztX7o=; b=hqx0reMW9QZvxZSN+Mv1XHI2YWA9/S6efODVE+p7q7tY2WF/Lzpgsv+1LGYZwF6MjL I9ciUUVVMEYUT3hFN+EAIzWtHL2Y1FrySmS4tSGgr2wnHHBo2hMsr310rjOiZ0o6YISE ZxEddOviY/o9oD2d84x4w6GO0FVjvHXKtTY5k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.106.136 with SMTP id x8mr799841vco.15.1328457651934; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:00:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.177.130 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 08:00:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F2D5774.1030706@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:00:51 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discussion] Printing from Flex From: Marc Pires To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be1f271574704b839a62a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043be1f271574704b839a62a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I agree with you guys, Flash player printing support is terrible. I'd like to work on solid solution for that. Let's see how it develops as soon as the source code is available. On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 2/4/12 8:06 AM, "Martin Heidegger" wrote: > > > Hello Jack, > > > > I came to the conclusion that printing is basically broken in flash. I > > didn't manage to get a solid printing solution done with Flash even with > > years of experience and two weeks time last October. Pages were > > distorted, missing or black. I was rather astonished because I remember > > a working printing solution in Flash Player 9. It seems it doesn't work > > since Flash Player 10.2 or so. Don't get me wrong: It works for some > > cases like if the sheet to print is simple enough as vector or small > > enough as bitmap, but it has very narrow limits. Bugs have been filed > > and marked fixed, even though they are not. I didn't take the time to > > provide a solid test suite at that time for printing with broken results > > as I got into serious deadline problems because of mentioned bugs. > Sounds like you hit the advanced printing bug where the player will try to > generate a 600DPI bitmap of the page, run out of spooling space and corrupt > the print job. Should have been alleviated a bit in 10.3. > > Otherwise, the Flex print components have issues, but player printing is > good enough for digital yearbooks. > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > --f46d043be1f271574704b839a62a--